Author: Peter W. Gillgasch
Date: 17:56:21 01/25/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 25, 2000 at 08:46:27, Chris Carson wrote: >Does anyone know what position(s) HSU used >to get the 100M NPS (DB) or 200M NPS for >DBII? Why do you think that the position matters at all ? As long as he can keep the chips busy the total number of cycles should be constant. Since he was doing the last 4 plies in hardware - and that means that he basically did all the positions in hardware - I suspect that the overhead onthe SP which certainly depends on the position can be neglected... Obvious, isn´t it ? -- Peter >Was it one position or many position's? Was it >middle game, endgame, or combination? > >I would like to have the EPD for the >position, it would be interesting to >benchmark against. :) > >Thanks. > >Best Regards, >Chris Carson
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.