Author: Pete Galati
Date: 00:17:07 01/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2000 at 02:40:05, allan johnson wrote: >On January 26, 2000 at 17:08:51, Pete Galati wrote: > >>On January 26, 2000 at 16:36:39, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>I think my post was misunderstood a bit (my fault, I'm sure). It was intended >>>as a general remark about persons announcing departure over the years. I just >>>think that (in general) it's not a good idea to exit in protest. Either exit, >>>or protest. But not both. >>> >>>Exiting because you don't like it here is fine. >>> >>>Protesting a condition you think unfair is fine. >>> >>>I think the combination is not a good mix. If you want to try to fix something, >>>running away is not how to solve it. If you don't care if it gets fixed or not, >>>then don't bark about it. >>> >>>IMO-YMMV. >> >>What is "IMO-YMMV" that's a new one to me. >> >>I'm one of those people who's baffled by the recent "I resign" thing. Now >>admitedly while I've disagreed with Bob occasionally, I haven't had any knock >>down arguements with him, but even if I did, well, so big deal. It's not like >>he's the only one posting at CCC. >> >>Yeah, it seems to me like he needs to sit in the snow, not quit CCC. >> >>Pete > Pete So you haven't done things hastily and then changed your mind? Come >on give me a break.The man's clearly had time to think over his actions >and decided that his initial decision was the wrong one.He needs support > not a lecture. >Cheers Allan I didn't lecture him at all, in fact, I stayed out of that thread completely, and I'm glad he changed his mind and decided to stay, but that doesn't mean that I'm going to go over to the "I resign" thread and say something cheerfull like wlecome back! Chris doesn't need to hear that from me, he already knows that most people wanted him to stay. Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.