Author: Albert Silver
Date: 06:51:35 01/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2000 at 05:35:01, stuart taylor wrote: >On January 27, 2000 at 02:18:23, Shanti wrote: > >>Hi >> >>Here it is :-) >> >>[Event "?"] >>[Site "?"] >>[Date "2000.01.21"] >>[Round "2"] >>[White "Soffer, Ram"] >>[Black "Fritz 6"] >>[Result "1-0"] >>[ECO "A06"] >>[PlyCount "49"] >> >>1. Nf3 c5 2. e3 Nf6 3. b3 d5 4. Bb2 Nc6 5. Bb5 Bd7 6. O-O e6 7. d3 Be7 8. Nbd2 >>O-O 9. Qe2 a6 10. Bxc6 Bxc6 11. Ne5 Qc7 12. f4 b5 13. Nxc6 Qxc6 14. Nf3 Nd7 15. >>Ne5 Nxe5 16. fxe5 c4 17. Bd4 b4 18. Rf2 c3 19. Raf1 a5 20. Qh5 Qe8 21. Rf6 Qb5 >>22. R1f3 Rfc8 23. Qxf7+ Kh8 24. Qxe7 Qe8 25. Rxe6 1-0 >> >>Bye, Shanti >> >>On January 27, 2000 at 00:49:44, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>thanks Jouni > > >Incredible! simple! instructive! Surely there was luck in it. Why? >He just made the >right efforts, and it turned out very well. Yes, he just outplayed the computer and luckily ended up winning. :-) > What were the main mistakes of computer, and what were the main anti-computer >moves of Ram Sofer? He played better chess. > We see that fritz abandoned his King, but was 14...Nd7 wrong? after that I >don't think it would have been easy even for a human as black, but what did he >do so bad before move 14? > 21.Rf6!! is the final blow, but wasn't it a bit of luck that such a move >existed? I am certain Sofer saw this possibility well in advance. It is an easy move to see as it is a classic tactical theme. All in all, Fritz looked pretty clueless in this game. Albert Silver > I myself wouldn't have known to have played 15.Ne5.(blocking own bishop and >doubling pawns etc.but maybe the opening of f-file against weakly defended king >with so little mobility-made it a sure thing) Was this distinctly >anti-computer? > Stuart Taylor.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.