Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ICC tourney standings after round 4

Author: Stefan Meyer-Kahlen

Date: 07:16:01 01/31/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 31, 2000 at 06:59:36, Amir Ban wrote:

>On January 31, 2000 at 05:14:59, Stefan Meyer-Kahlen wrote:
>
>>On January 31, 2000 at 03:42:35, Amir Ban wrote:
>>
>>>On January 30, 2000 at 22:51:08, James T. Walker wrote:
>>>
>>>>On January 30, 2000 at 19:24:00, Tom Kerrigan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Place  Program          Score  SOP
>>>>>    1  Crafty           4.0    8.0
>>>>>    2  Junior           3.0    9.0
>>>>>       Diep             3.0    9.0
>>>>>    4  Shredder         3.0    8.0
>>>>>    5  Insomniac        3.0    5.5
>>>>>    6  Nimzo            2.5    11.5
>>>>>    7  Little_Goliath   2.5    9.5
>>>>>    8  Galahad          2.5    6.5
>>>>>       Lambchop         2.5    6.5
>>>>>   10  Ferret           2.0    10.5
>>>>>   11  Postmodernist    2.0    9.5
>>>>>   12  Hossa            2.0    7.0
>>>>>   13  Bringer          1.5    9.5
>>>>>       Amateur          1.5    9.5
>>>>>   15  Shrike           1.5    9.0
>>>>>   16  Gnuchess         1.5    8.5
>>>>>   17  Grok             1.5    7.5
>>>>>   18  EXchess          1.5    7.0
>>>>>   19  Tinker           1.0    7.0
>>>>>   20  Storm            1.0    5.5
>>>>>   21  Averno           0.5    6.5
>>>>>   22  TSCP             0.5    5.5
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hello,
>>>>I am enjoying this tournament.  I would like to see a list of programs including
>>>>the hardware they are using.  Can someone point me in the right direction?
>>>>Also, I think it should be mentioned that it is Shredder 3 and not Shredder 4
>>>>that is playing.
>>>>Jim Walker
>>>
>>>I disagree. If Stefan wants Shredder 4 to play he can arrange it in a second.
>>>Everybody bring their best software and best hardware, and programs should be
>>>called by their generic name.
>>>
>>>Amir
>>
>>Shredder3 is the best program I have that is automatic on ICC. That's why S3 is
>>playing and not S4, so I'd rather call it Shredder3.
>>
>>Right now I don't have time to add and test the automatic interface in S4,
>>otherwise I would have done it.
>>
>>Stefan
>
>If so you should play manually because the overhead is of no consequence in this
>time control.
>
>Amir

I asked my operator who also owns S4 weather he wants to use S4 manually. He
said no and as I don't have time to operate myself... voila.

Stefan



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.