Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: New SSDF-list!!!

Author: Christophe Theron

Date: 21:58:37 01/31/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 31, 2000 at 09:38:21, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:

>On January 31, 2000 at 09:30:27, Amir Ban wrote:
>
>>On January 31, 2000 at 07:48:02, Albert Silver wrote:
>>
>>>On January 30, 2000 at 13:36:38, Hans Christian Lykke wrote:
>>>
>>>>-  Games   Won  Oppo
>>>>                                           ------  ---   --- -----   ---  ----
>>>>   1 Junior 6.0  128MB K6-2 450 MHz          2706   38   -35   403   70%  2556
>>>>   2 Chess Tiger 12.0 DOS 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2682   37   -35   414   67%  2555
>>>>   3 Nimzo 7.32  128MB K6-2 450 MHz          2661   36   -34   420   68%  2530
>>>>   4 Fritz 5.32  128MB K6-2 450 MHz          2659   34   -32   474   65%  2548
>>>>   5 Junior 5.0  128MB K6-2 450 MHz          2629   35   -33   438   63%  2532
>>>>   6 Nimzo 99  128MB K6-2 450 MHz            2627   44   -42   278   64%  2526
>>>>   7 Hiarcs 7.32  128MB K6-2 450 MHz         2624   40   -38   347   66%  2505
>>>>   8 Chessmaster 6000  64MB P200 MMX         2574   61   -53   184   76%  2378
>>>
>>>Wow. Sorry if I forgot to convey my own congratulations to Amir and Shay. Like
>>>everyone else who doesn't yet have the program (notice the "yet"), I am
>>>extremely curious to play this newest of the wunderkinds. Afterall, it is the
>>>first to clearly sidestep the results of certain secret tests of certain
>>>secretive Spanish testers, showing a true evolutive step towards that elusive
>>>superiority of knowledge over tactics, allowing it to 'see' beyond its tactical
>>>boundaries. And not content with this you even released a patch improving it! My
>>>hat is off. Congratulations once more!
>>>
>>>                                     Albert Silver
>>
>>Thanks very much. And, yes, I was going to about the "secret test suite", but
>>you beat me to it.
>
>So the test goes to its original purpose. Still, all programs perform basically
>the same in the test and in the SSDF list, as Bertil and Christophe can confirm,
>and this includes Junior 5. The exception is Junior 6. Why! :(
>
>Enrique


No offense intended to the new #1, but your test does not take book quality and
book learning quality into account, Enrique.

I have still faith in your test. It is too good to be damaged by one exception,
and the exception can be maybe explained by other factors.



    Christophe



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.