Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 23:13:49 01/31/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2000 at 01:01:33, Michael Cummings wrote: >On February 01, 2000 at 00:45:41, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On January 31, 2000 at 17:37:22, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>Why doesn't someone send a suggestion to the Chessmaster folks, asking them to >>>include an autoplayer? (Or *better yet* Winboard capability)?? >>> >>>It seems that lots of people would like to see it tested. Why burden the poor >>>SSDF testers, when the existance of an autoplayer or Winboard compatibility >>>would remove the problem? >> >> >>Why do the same threads get repeated again and again each time a new SSDF list >>is out, in almost the same words? >> >>It gets boring. :) >> >>Thanks, Michael Cummings. >> >> >> Christophe > >Your Welcome Christophe :) > >I think they get repeated cause I see the power of the Chess Engine as being the >ultimate. Johann is a master Chess programmer (if not the best :-) > >Until CM6K or sadly CM7K is tested and the results show that the others are >better when using the faster hardware, I will keep on beating the King Engines >drum :) BOOM BANG BOOM !!!!!!!!!!!!!! > >:-) > >I will continue to fight for the equal rights of all computer chess programs, A >fair system for all is what we all want in the end to find the best of the best. > >I must fight for TRUTH, JUSTICE & THE AUSTRALIAN WAY !!!!! Why not volunteer Michael and play 200 40/2hr games manually :) Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.