Author: Paulo Soares
Date: 00:16:21 02/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2000 at 01:01:33, Michael Cummings wrote: >On February 01, 2000 at 00:45:41, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On January 31, 2000 at 17:37:22, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>Why doesn't someone send a suggestion to the Chessmaster folks, asking them to >>>include an autoplayer? (Or *better yet* Winboard capability)?? >>> >>>It seems that lots of people would like to see it tested. Why burden the poor >>>SSDF testers, when the existance of an autoplayer or Winboard compatibility >>>would remove the problem? >> >> >>Why do the same threads get repeated again and again each time a new SSDF list >>is out, in almost the same words? >> >>It gets boring. :) >> >>Thanks, Michael Cummings. >> >> >> Christophe > >Your Welcome Christophe :) > >I think they get repeated cause I see the power of the Chess Engine as being the >ultimate. Johann is a master Chess programmer (if not the best :-) > >Until CM6K or sadly CM7K is tested and the results show that the others are >better when using the faster hardware, I will keep on beating the King Engines >drum :) BOOM BANG BOOM !!!!!!!!!!!!!! > >:-) > >I will continue to fight for the equal rights of all computer chess programs, A >fair system for all is what we all want in the end to find the best of the best. > >I must fight for TRUTH, JUSTICE & THE AUSTRALIAN WAY !!!!! Michael, stop of crying, the Chessmaster reign finished when Mindscape didn't modernize The King version. You already found the place for the CompxComp games in Sydney Olimpyeda ? Obviously, without the CM6000 participation. Paulo Soares, with the brazilian way of life
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.