Author: Imran Hendley
Date: 18:17:25 02/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2000 at 10:35:56, robert michelena wrote: 200 Games manually operating Tiger against random opponents with random hardware using or not using random programs with random lag time from operators is not an environment in which to draw conclusion about playing strength. I suggest auto232 or manual matches operated by the same person or at least at the same location. >Mr. Chen has nicely summed up the differences. With Fritz you get all the bells >and whistles ( editing opening books, ...etc ); Tiger you get playing strength. > In the competitive world of Yahoo advanced chess, my observations, after >approximately 200 games each using Tiger, as well as Fritz and Junior 6, is that >Tiger and Junior are approximately equal in playing strength; Fritz 6 is not >quite as strong. Tiger is strongest, I feel in 10 minute games; Junior is >better in the endgame ( due to its endgame tablebases ). > >To recapitulate, Tiger plays a very solid game of chess; much more so, I feel >then Fritz or the other programs I own. However, in 30 minute games (and >longer) Nimzo 732 is still, in my opinion, stronger then Tiger or Junior 6. > >Note, both junior and fritz were the updated versions
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.