Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: New SSDF-list!!!

Author: Chessfun

Date: 22:14:33 02/01/00

Go up one level in this thread


On February 02, 2000 at 01:03:26, Tina Long wrote:

>On February 01, 2000 at 11:21:57, Chessfun wrote:
>
>>On February 01, 2000 at 00:43:26, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>
>><lots snipped>
>>
>>>What do you say about Fritz6 followed several weeks after by Fritz6a, and
>>>Junior6 followed by Junior6a?
>>
>>
>>I for one opposed the SSDF testing of Rebel-Tiger prior to release.
>>And still believe that position is correct and would maintain it
>>relevant to any testing by the SSDF prior to the release of any program.
>>
>>In the case of F6, it was not being tested by the SSDF prior to
>>the release of the upgrade. This upgrade is also -NOT- F6a. F6a is
>>being used by Enrique but is -NOT- a released engine by Chessbase.
>>The only engines that exist (excluding Light) are Fritz 6 Old and Fritz 6.
>>
>>As for Junior it is true the SSDF were testing Junior 6 prior to the
>>release of the upgrade now referred to as Junior 6a. However at the point
>>they started testing, Junior 6 was available in the marketplace. And when
>>they switched to 6a that 6a patch was also made available to the marketplace.
>>
>>Thanks.
>
>I think they can test what they want when they want to.
>The fact that they publish their results is a bonus for us.
>They acknowledged that Tiger wasn't available yet, but they were so impressed
>with the engine they wanted to test it.
>
>I don't think they wanted to just look at the CDROM for many months without
>playing with it.
>
>SSDF have no Obligation to anybody or any program.  They are a group of
>enthusiasts who practise their hobby.
>
>I hope they never get offended by all the critisism they get & start to withhold
>their results from the public.  Although it would be quite just if they did.
>
>Onya SSDF
>Onya Amir and Shay
>Onya Junior6
>
>Tina Long


Being oppossed to the testing of Rebel-Tiger prior to it's release,
is not what I would consider a critisism on the SSDF. As I recall
Bertil had posted what he thought they might test next and various
alternates were talked about as it was the first time for the K2-450's.
It is as I have stated before just MHO. In fact I don't read anything
I have said as a critisism of the SSDF. I am just one of the many who
look forward to going over the games played by them and appreciate all
the hard work and hours of dedication shown by all the testers.
Thanks.





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.