Author: blass uri
Date: 08:25:30 02/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 02, 2000 at 08:40:32, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On February 02, 2000 at 08:33:57, Charles Unruh wrote: > >>On February 02, 2000 at 06:42:52, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >> >>>On February 01, 2000 at 22:13:43, Charles Unruh wrote: >>> >>>>What's Enriques test suite prediction for J6? >>> >>>T12 -51. As you see, it's way off. >>> >>>>What are the theories for the >>>>deviation between (ENRIQUE'S)test suite and ssdf? >>> >>>More than theories, what I have is a list of over 20 programs that perform >>>basically the same in my test and in the SSDF list. Junior 6 is the exception, >>>is the only program I checked whose strength is greater than its tactical >>>ability. >>> >> >>If this is the answer i fear for rebel, because if Rebel's strength isn't >>greater than it's tactical ability(and it's tactical ability is weak-relatively >>speaking of course) then it's in trouble > >Century is in trouble. But the Century 1.2 update is already much faster than >Century, so we'll see. > >Enrique I am not sure if century is in trouble because the bad result of century may be because of the autoplayer. If you have the times per move in the games of Rebel century and if Rebel can do auromatic analysis to check if it can reproduce the same moves at the same time control (I do not think there are volunteers to check it manually) then we can see exactly the moves that cannot be reproduced. Century has good results in the first Israeli league including a draw against Deep Junior when Deep Junior had the better hardware. Century's results in the Israeli league are better than other programs with better hardware. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.