Author: Lawrence S. Tamarkin
Date: 00:48:34 02/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
Hi: Clearly, Accelerated Dragons are not only faster than the normal dragon variations, but offer richer, and more uncharted, imaginative play. I recommend our book, 'Accelerated Dragons', by John Donaldson & Jeremy Silman, 320 p.p., published, 1998, Cadogan press. No, really - The classical dragon is a much better choice. Didn't you ever see the classic demonstration, Fischer-Larsen, Portoroz, 1958? (game 2 in Bobby Fischer's, 'My 60 memorable Games'). Anyway, you can win beautiful games from either side if you read my book, 'Winning With The Dragon', by Chris Ward, 208 p.p., Batsford, published 1994. What? - you think its a little dated?, Well then, subscribe to my site at, www.chesspublishing.com You won't be sorry! Chris Ward. Just kidding (or am I?)... Larry T On February 03, 2000 at 23:46:25, Rich Shippy wrote: >Which defence is easier to learn, the Dragon or the Accelerated Dragon? >Which defence is a better response to e4, the Dragon or Accelerated Dragon? >I want to learn one of the Sicilian systems as black but do not know which one >to choose. Maybe I should play the Najdorf, please help.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.