Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 07:36:31 02/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 06, 2000 at 10:04:11, jonathon smith wrote: >On February 06, 2000 at 09:55:06, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On February 06, 2000 at 09:23:51, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On February 06, 2000 at 01:21:23, Ed Schröder wrote: >>> >>>>On February 05, 2000 at 23:26:55, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 05, 2000 at 21:06:15, Peter Kasinski wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>I think that Bob made an unfortunate oversight by not straightening this >>>>>>"censor" business in time for the tournament (i.e. he was late days not >>>>>>minutes). >>>>> >>>>>There I disagree. The "censor" was for a purpose. The "reason" didn't >>>>>disappear "days before the tournament". The "censor" will stand _after_ >>>>>the tournament. I don't take accusations of misconduct lightly, now, back >>>>>three months ago, nor will I take them lightly in the future. >>>> >>>>>I don't censor to disrupt a tournament. >>>> >>>>You managed anyway. The censor was there while it should have not. >>>> >>>>Ed >>> >>>A. A censor list is _mine_ to control, _not_ yours. I censor when/who I >>>choose, and that is my decision, not yours. The censor was removed _prior_ >>>to the start of the round, at least 10 minutes prior to in fact. _I_ didn't >>>disrupt the event. >>> >>>B. I don't see what your one-liner offers to the discussion, either. >> >>I don't like people being lynched. When this occurs I tend to point out >>the "+" points of the lynched party as nothing happens for no reason. In >>case you don't understand my point, I will do the very same in case the >>opposite will happen to you. It just ain't right, double period. >> >>Ed >> > >ChrisW told me that this comment is hypocritical. Mr Schroder has engaged in a >ex-legal lynching himself in the case of ChrisW who was 'lynched' from the CCC >even though he had not posted into the CCC for five months. Wrong. When moderators, or in your case the founders, give the red card to someone and is banned from CCC, there is no lynching. The lynching was and is done by you and some others on RGCC. We replied once as a group on CCC. The lynching done by you took place months before and years after. It is your regurgitations on the matter what is hypocritical. People are talking about what happened yesterday. Your usual ME ME ME is also hypocritical. Enrique PS. I don't bother answering to split personalities when they pick on me, but don't count on it when it happens to others. >>>>>I censor to show that I strongly disagree >>>>>with the person that made the accusation. I think it funny that _I_ was >>>>>wrong for censoring him, but he doesn't think he was wrong when he made >>>>>about the most idiotic statement ever made here (and directed toward me.) >>>>> >>>>>After witnessing today's claims/counter-claims/etc, I only wish we had a >>>>>'+censor' option for CCC. I would exercise _that_ as well. :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And that?s regardless of its genesis. I understand how Amir must have >>>>>>felt. Unfortunately, for all his contribution to computer chess (who else is >>>>>>there? ) Bob isn?t exactly a sweetheart at times. >>>>>> >>>>>>But what?s really disturbing is a bunch of postings here from adolescent would >>>>>>be moderators trying to give either one of them lessons in good manners. >>>>>> >>>>>>PK
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.