Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Interesting endgame from ICC

Author: Ed Schröder

Date: 02:30:22 02/07/00

Go up one level in this thread


On February 07, 2000 at 02:18:46, James Robertson wrote:

>On February 06, 2000 at 13:44:48, Ed Schröder wrote:
>
>>On February 06, 2000 at 11:18:29, James Robertson wrote:
>>
>>>On February 06, 2000 at 11:17:02, James Robertson wrote:
>>>
>>>>On February 06, 2000 at 08:23:59, Howard Exner wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>[D]6k1/p4p1p/1b2p3/8/PP4p1/6Pn/4K1BP/B7 w - - id Insomniac - Shredder3; bm Nxh3;
>>>>>
>>>>>The try Nxh3 instead of the move played, Be5, has some merit. Should at least
>>>>>draw and a possible win for white may also be hidden here somewhere. Check it
>>>>>out. After 1.Nxh3 gxh3 2. a5  Black can try to eventually capture Bxg3 (Bg1 or
>>>>>Bc7) but white's advanced queenside pawns will be lurking. Any good defense here
>>>>>for black?
>>>>
>>>>I was horrified in the way my program completely bungled this position. I am
>>>>certain there is a win for black somewhere, and at the worst a draw.
>>>
>>>er, white.
>>
>>I think you are right. My thing also confirms your feeling:
>>
>>00:00:05 10.00  -0.14   1.a5 Ng1+ 2.Kd3 Bf2 3.b5 Nf3 4.b6
>>                       Nxh2 5.bxa7  (4)
>>
>>00:00:09 11.00  -0.22   1.a5 Ng1+ 2.Kf1 Be3 3.b5 Nf3 4.h3
>>                       Bd4 5.Bxf3 Bxa1+ 6.Bxg4 f5 7.Bf3
>>                       e5  (7)
>>
>>00:00:18 12.00  -0.22   1.a5 Ng1+ 2.Kd3 Bf2 3.Bd4 Bxd4 4.Kxd4
>>                       Nf3+ 5.Bxf3 gxf3 6.Ke3 f5 7.Kxf3
>>                       e5 8.h3 Kf7 9.b5 Ke6 10.Ke3  (14)
>>
>>00:00:43 13.00  -0.24   1.a5 Ng1+ 2.Kf1 Be3 3.b5 h5 4.Bb2
>>                       Nf3 5.h3 Bc5 6.hxg4 hxg4 7.Ke2 Nd4+
>>                       8.Bxd4 Bxd4+ 9.Kd3  (31)
>>
>>00:02:08 14.00  0.19   1.a5 Bg1 2.Be5 Bxh2 3.b5 Bg1 4.Bc7
>>                       f5  (72)
>>
>>00:04:22 15.00  0.46   1.a5 Bg1 2.Be5 Kf8 3.b5 Ke7+ 4.Bc7
>>                       Bd4 5.b6 Kd7 6.Bxh3 gxh3 7.Be5 axb6  (162)
>>
>>The rise of the score is remarkable.
>>
>>Ed
>>
>
>Insomniac requires 15 ply to realize that a5 is best. It still doesn't evaluate
>it as good for white, though. Ironically, it searched 14 ply before deciding on
>its move.
>
>Obviously you are doing some better extensions/scoring here than I am. What
>extensions would you suggest to improve Insomniac's evaluation/search of this
>position?

I think the bishop-pair + seeing the b-passer appearing in the search
does the a5 trick in this position.

Ed

>James
>
>>
>>>>Shredder's score went from +0.04 (even though it is a pawn up) to +0.96 after
>>>>Be5. Insomniac's first preference (Bxh3) is obviously better, and Shredder's
>>>>predicted a5 is probably the best.
>>>>
>>>>James



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.