Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: NEW VERSION OF TSCP (1.5)

Author: Tom Kerrigan

Date: 13:47:22 02/14/00

Go up one level in this thread

On February 14, 2000 at 16:26:40, Dann Corbit wrote:

>That's some very pretty code Tom, and one of the cleanest compiles I have seen.
>I do have two suggestions:
>
>1.  Make the header files idempotent

idempotent?

-Tom

• Re: NEW VERSION OF TSCP (1.5) Endgame play Andrew 21:50:01 02/14/00
  • Re: NEW VERSION OF TSCP (1.5) Endgame play Tom Kerrigan 09:34:45 02/16/00
• Why idempotent? Dann Corbit 14:00:52 02/14/00
  • Re: Why idempotent? Sanjiv Karnataki 17:47:20 02/14/00
    • Re: Why idempotent? Dann Corbit 18:06:26 02/14/00
      • Re: Why idempotent? Sanjiv Karnataki 18:49:15 02/14/00
        • Re: Why idempotent? Dann Corbit 19:36:25 02/14/00
          • Re: Why idempotent? Dann Corbit 19:36:59 02/14/00
  • Re: Why idempotent? William Bryant 15:22:34 02/14/00
    • Re: Why idempotent? Dann Corbit 15:58:51 02/14/00
    • Re: Why idempotent? Daniel Clausen 15:43:16 02/14/00
      • Re: Why idempotent? Heiner Marxen 09:50:46 02/15/00
        • Re: Why idempotent? Daniel Clausen 13:02:05 02/15/00
          • Re: Off topic: reserved identifiers in C Heiner Marxen 13:23:41 02/15/00
  • Re: Why idempotent? Pete Galati 14:37:44 02/14/00
    • Re: Why idempotent? Dann Corbit 14:45:37 02/14/00
      • Re: Why idempotent? Pete Galati 15:28:44 02/14/00
      • Re: Why idempotent? Tom Kerrigan 15:03:44 02/14/00
        • Re: Why idempotent? Dann Corbit 16:01:11 02/14/00
• Idempotent Dann Corbit 13:57:40 02/14/00

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.