Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The game Adams - Deep Junior

Author: James T. Walker

Date: 15:13:37 02/16/00

Go up one level in this thread


On February 16, 2000 at 18:11:57, James T. Walker wrote:

>On February 16, 2000 at 18:07:45, blass uri wrote:
>
>>On February 16, 2000 at 17:49:59, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:
>>
>>>On February 16, 2000 at 17:25:09, Amir Ban wrote:
>>>
>>>>On February 16, 2000 at 16:43:12, Amir Ban wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On February 16, 2000 at 16:06:03, Amir Ban wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>This game is not over. There are major communication problems at the
>>>>>>KasparovChess offices. The game has been stopped, and there are discussions
>>>>>>going on on what to do next.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Needless to say, this is not making me happy. Apologies to all viewers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Amir
>>>>>
>>>>>It has been agreed with GM Adams to call game one a DRAW.
>>>>>
>>>>>The second game will start in about 20 minutes. Communication looks good at this
>>>>>moment. Let's hope we can play the second game to finish :(
>>>>>
>>>>>Amir
>>>>
>>>>GM Adams has now changed his mind and wants the entire 2-game match to be
>>>>declared his win by forfeit.
>>>
>>>Who is accepting so much crap from Adams? He lost game 1 and that's all there is
>>>to it.
>>>
>>>Enrique
>>
>>If the time trouble in game 1 was because of a communication problem then I
>>agree that adams lost game 1 but if the time trouble of Junior was because of a
>>bug in Junior when it used a lot of time for move 29 then the fair result of
>>game one is not clear.
>>
>>I understood from another post that the fact that Junior had less than 2 minutes
>>to finish the game was because of a bug in Junior.
>>
>>Uri
>

Hello Uri,
None of that matters now.  The game was "Declared" a draw and now the only
question is if the coward is going to finish the match.
Jim Walker




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.