Author: Paulo Soares
Date: 16:10:20 02/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2000 at 18:54:40, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On February 16, 2000 at 18:50:07, Angel Antonio Jimenez Arteaga wrote: > >>Dear chessfriends: >> >>The problem is clear: >> >>Adams could play this first game at the end and wait flag of Deep Junior down: >> >>this means: >> >>Adams - Deep Junior6 : 1-0 >> >>I saw all the game. > >So did I. > >> I saw Junior5 > >Deep Junior. > >> to think about 20 minutes because Junior >>program didn´t know the position with the black bishop in h3. DeepJunior thought >>he´s winning, but it´s not clear. For this reason the computer time was down and >>at the end computer would lose for time... > >Nonsense. At the end, Adams clock went down to 0, zero. > >Enrique > >>This is the active chess... This is legal. Adams could win a lost game by >>time... This is the reglament. All you speak about it, it´s a lost time, if your >>don´t think in this form. From "Week in Chess": Game one was agreed drawn (even though it was probably winning for the computer) due to internet problems (2nd game follows later tonight, both games will be here tomorrow morning. Adams seems over his mild food poisoning.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.