Author: Manuel Rodriguez Blanco
Date: 20:00:19 02/16/00
Lets analyze this a litter, Facts: - Adams get a win for the match. (he will play Kasparov). - Adams and DJ dont finish one game then they didnot play any complete game. - The create situation was complex and delicate but not insoluble. Very probable Facts: - The problems that prevent finish the 1 game was net problems (if was participant problems then simple solution will be forfeited that participant). hypothetical case: Change Deep Junnior by Shirov (for example) then simulate the same situacion with the same problems, (only diference is Shirov is playing instead DJ) Then how can we justify the decicion of forfeit Shirov? HOW? This decicion is only explain with a big discrimination against the Computer in this case program DJ. Race discrimination Sex discrimination Religion discrimination geography discrimination .... discrimination .... discrimination etc. discrimination and now: Computers discrimination Are the Human been a genetic discriminator???, When we learn to make just decicion or at least not make unjust desicions??? Note: Of course the "computer dont get tired" argument is not valid because the resistance or stamina is one more quality of all chess player like knowledge or calculate lines., Then in this especific characteristic (resistence) computer are best than any human. But if you continuous think that the decicion taken is in some form justify by this factor then you are saying that we most give Adams 2 points and the match because he is very tired" MRB.-
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.