Author: Manuel Rodriguez Blanco
Date: 20:34:40 02/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2000 at 23:09:19, Charles Milton Ling wrote: >You have some good points. >But when I was referring to fatigue, I just wanted to point out that Adams was >prepared to play 2 2-hour games. Not one game that took about 6 and another >that might have taken God-knows-how-long. >I doubt you will seem many GM entries in tournaments if the conditions state >that the human might have to play - or wait - for 12 hours a day. >Charley Sure i am agree with you totally, i only mean that the soluction for that delicate case is of course NOT forfeit one of the part. And other point is that the person who make the decicion most think the soluction for 2 participant independently that one is a computer, BUT in this tragic case the person who make the decicion do the contrary, he (or they) take advantage of 1 of the participant (the computer) for make his soluction, that is a VILLAINOUS decicion. MRB.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.