Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 07:21:11 02/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2000 at 10:17:02, blass uri wrote: >On February 17, 2000 at 10:14:01, Jürgen Hartmann wrote: > >> >>>Which is just the wrong way to figure things out. Kasparov was not even involved >>>in the decision. Take a look at >>>http://www.kasparovchess.com/serve/templates/dispchessdoc.asp?p_docID=2499&p_docLang=EN >>> >> >>I don't believe a word of those crocodiles tears. The technical unprobability >>stares you right in the face. I mean anybody of us could have logged into their >>site with Junior on a notebook within seconds and played the game against Adams! >>I played a couple of guest games online there. Provider down? You dial another >>provider. Power failure? You call a friend on your mobile phone to log in and >>play the game on his computer. This is a multimillion dollar multinational web >>company and they are not able to connect to the internet? >> >>This was a very convenient technical problem which happened exactly in the >>second when Junior got a winning position. Suddenly everybody in the company saw >>that Junior would play against Kasparov and kill him. So "they were not able to >>connect to the internet" anymore. > >I think that you underestimate kasparov. >kasparov is better than every computer at g/60 ... and he is not afraid of anything or anyone capable of playing chess. Saying the contrary is not understanding Kasparov. Enrique >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.