Author: stuart taylor
Date: 07:57:10 02/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2000 at 04:51:48, Manuel Rodriguez Blanco wrote: >On February 17, 2000 at 03:18:27, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On February 16, 2000 at 23:05:48, Manuel Rodriguez Blanco wrote: >> >>>On February 16, 2000 at 22:03:20, odell hall wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Michael Adams was one of my favourites, but after this shameful performance I >>>>would not spit on his tongue if he were dying of thirst in the desert! >>> >>>Adams was my modern favourite, i copy his repertoire for my play, but after that >>>i dont care any more about him, for me he can dissapear. But i understand that >>>the main guilty of this violation was who make the decicion of forfey DJ. he or >>>they deserver *&$%^#%^(^%* >>> >>> >>>MRB. >> >> >>Adams would have made his claims out of routine-not expecting them to be >>accepted. It's elementary business logic. >>s.Taylor > >Think well what are you saying, try to make bad things because other will not >permit you do that is not ok, isnt it? >if i am 100% sure i will dont get something i ask, then is a waste of time to >ask, isnt it? > >MRB Maybe, but he probably didn't mind forfeiting DJ anyway after all what he went through. I now understand differently from all the other postings, and that the organisers probably said after Adams wasted day-either play now, or claim forfeiture of DJ. And he certainly didn't have time and a head to play again right then! S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.