Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 08:49:30 02/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
i don't see your point, nor enriques ppoint here. if we would have very very fast computers, chess would be solved. than it would be deterministic. point. we haven't. so the players can only come CLOSE to the reality when they play. we cannot find out accurate. tarrasch ideas about THE ACCURATE move can only work if chess is solved. as long as we don't know the accurate moves, it makes no sense only to look in the result. cause the result has only a tendency to do with the game itself. if chess would be solved, the result would be the casual end of the game, of each move ! the result would be the one and only logical result. since this has not happened, we can only guess that the result has something to do with the game. so for life. determinstic things have reasons. they follow rules. but there is another link between things. this comes via sense. sychronicities shows these links. the link can be between particles. and it does not matter where the particles are, maybe it even makes no difference when the particles were. and maybe : this makes all particles linked together. this generates sense. despite forces from mechanistic paradigms, these links are non-local. forces are local.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.