Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Blatantly Unfair to Deep J

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 19:20:06 02/20/00

Go up one level in this thread


On February 20, 2000 at 19:57:30, C McClain Morris wrote:

>I don't think anyone can argue with the fact that it was preposterous for Deep J
>to be forfeited against Adams. If during the course of a basketball game, the
>lights go out (a crash of another kind), I have never seen the game forfeited
>due to a problem that was out of the control of either participant. What's
>really going on here? Anyone have any ideas?
>C Morris

Nah, just the normal tournament practice which gets overruled if junior
would've been a GM.

If you're too late for a contest, no matter whether the lights from your
car went off, or whether you ran out of petrol, or whether someone
crashed into you, you're forfeited.

For some GM's they make exceptions though. That's the unfair part.
Not the forfeit of junior is unfair, but the fact that they had no problems
delaying kasparov-piket for a day....

Very fair was however that piket won in a computerish way from kasparov,
just grabbing a pawn then defending the rest of the second game that pawn
till the endgame and win the game somewhere there. great show from piket.

let's vote for renaming flyingpiket (handle of Jeroen Piket at icc) to
crushingpiket.

Vincent




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.