Author: leonid
Date: 04:25:29 02/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2000 at 17:19:36, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >What do you mean by "very secretive Windows system and almost complet lack of >literature"? Among MS API documentation there are more books describing Windows >programming than any other OS. > >Eugene When you go into programming on Assembler, not on C, and you you want to know really all the details from the base of the system, Windows is very secretive. When somebody slide over the services that Microsoft provide it is practically invisible. The can find some concret examples by reading the only publication on the subject done by Barry Kauler "Windows Assembly Language and System Programming". Magnificent book anyway to read if you want to write for Windows. Don't be surprised the Windows is very secretive, it is true even... for DOS. This is the reason why few books were printed about "Unknown services of DOS", or some title of this nature. We had few books printed on the subject. Leonid. >On February 27, 2000 at 16:35:59, leonid wrote: > >>On February 27, 2000 at 13:59:49, Dan Andersson wrote: >> >>>Argh, MASM and TASM syntaxes are horrible IMO. >> >>What is IMO? >> >>I can't say nothing about syntax of any Assembler but I like (better it will be >>to say liked) MASM because of Microsoft excellent manual. Example - MASM 6.1. >>After this version, the next, MASM 6.11 came simply with the manual of MASM 6.1. >>Figure everything on your own! >> >>TASM have just horrible description and almost no books printed about this >>Assembler. Taking in consideration that assembling some chess game for Windows >>is really troublesome, very secretive Windows system and almost complet lack of >>literature, all well described Assembler (even the old one) is real wonderful >>blessing. >> >>Leonid.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.