Author: leonid
Date: 04:30:45 02/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2000 at 17:12:04, Dan Andersson wrote: >IMO = In My Opinion. >I like nasm because it has a clear and logical (noncontradictory) way of dealing >with indirection and allows aritmethic expressions (it even optimizes many >cases). It also has a high level of abstraction, almost at C levels. Thus its >easier to maintain than T/MASM. GAS as another example, is logical but hard to >read and maitain. If you used the NASM for writing the chess game, mainly for Windows, will be glad to know your opinion about capability of this Assembler and completeness of its package. I never used it. And how about the susbstitute, if such existe, for Software Development Kit that you need when writing for Windows on MASM or Borland Assembler? Leonid.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.