Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A Question for Dr. Hyatt

Author: Torstein Hall

Date: 00:49:24 03/02/00

Go up one level in this thread


On March 01, 2000 at 22:38:00, Tina Long wrote:

>On March 01, 2000 at 17:23:46, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>On March 01, 2000 at 16:56:24, Leon Stancliff wrote:
>>
>>>Dr. Hyatt,
>>>
>>> To the best of my ability I have endeavored to calculate the ratings of the six
>>>top computer chess programs when running on the AMD K6-2 450 hardware. Is it
>>>your opinion that the latest version of Crafty belongs in this list when playing
>>>at 40/2?
>>>
>>>Junior 6a      2631
>>>Chess Tiger    2607
>>>Nimzo 7.32     2584
>>>Fritz 5.32     2582
>>>Shredder 4     2577
>>>Hiarcs 7.32    2547
>>>
>>>Thanking you in advance whether or not you choose to respond. If you do choose
>>>to respond, a simple yes or no answer would suffice.
>>
>>Crafty just won an internet contest against all of these.  Crafty is designed
>>for SMP machines and with pondering on.  Under those conditions, it is as good
>>or better than any program in the world.  It would take extensive testing to see
>>how it would fare against the world's best programs (like the above list) at
>>40/2.  I suspect it would be competitive even on a uniprocessor.
>>
>>Some tests at 40/2 against other freely available Winboard engines seem to
>>indicate that it is the toughest dog in that town.
>>
>>There is no question that it is the strongest program in the world for which the
>>source code is publicly available, at the present time.
>
>Hi Dann, Dr Hyatt, et al.,  :)
>
>That post is a fine endorsement of Crafty.  It has aroused my interest.
>
>We've got Crafty 17.04 in our Hiarcs7.32, and although I've played several
>"friendly" games against it (about 0-0-50), I have more-or-less disregarded it
>in favour of H732, F5, RebelCent, Tigger, when I play seriously or do major
>analysis.  I think the cause is the mental block over it being free.
>

Try 17.07 as compiled by Chessbase as an engine. I feel that its the strongest
Crafty ever.....

Torstein


>Maybe I should show it some more respect & use it more as an analysis tool.
>
>Therefore a coupla questions please: (from anyone who wants to offer their
>opinion thanks)
>
>What is the "best" Crafty version currently available for download for the F5.32
>interface?
>
>How well does Crafty "stack up" against the best commercials in say 1 hour
>analysis of a position? (on a PII 400)  (I've thought it didn't, because I
>thought it wasn't selective-searching enough, I also thought it wasn't using
>hash -I'm more than happy to be told I'm wrong).
>
>Thanks guys
>Tina Long



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.