Author: blass uri
Date: 19:45:01 03/03/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 03, 2000 at 18:21:33, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On March 03, 2000 at 17:16:17, Derrick Williams wrote: > >pah ! > >nonsense. I think that based on the results of the public games that are posted here from the ssdf games Fritz6a is number 1. I see that Fritz6a is leading against tiger and is also very good in winning shredder2(p200) when Junior6 lost rating points against shredder2 and also had problems against some weak opponents(for example it lost twice against the king 2 with ssdf rating 2290 and had only 3.5:2.5 score against it). The rating of Junior6a include many games of Junior6 when the rating of Fritz6a include only games of Fritz6a because chessbase did not want the ssdf to test Fritz6 because they knew that it is not better than Fritz5.32. I read that you believe that Fritz6a is also weaker than Fritz5.32 but I understand that the ssdf testers get different results. I guess that the reason that you think Fritz5.32 is better than Fritz6a and not only better than Fritz6 is a wrong impression of you from small number of games. I also think that the ssdf is going to get always better results for Fritz versions in their tests because they use different hardware and matches and they do not do tournaments. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.