Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The Next #1 SSDF no doubt Fritz6a

Author: blass uri

Date: 06:27:44 03/04/00

Go up one level in this thread


On March 04, 2000 at 08:41:34, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>On March 03, 2000 at 21:51:00, James Robertson wrote:
>
>>On March 03, 2000 at 18:21:33, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>>
>>>On March 03, 2000 at 17:16:17, Derrick Williams wrote:
>>>
>>>pah !
>>>
>>>nonsense.
>>
>>On what do you base this? Not that I agree or disagree with you, but how did you
>>come to this conclusion?
>>
>>James
>
>
>watching the games in my tournament, fritz6a is weaker in tactics than
>fritz5.32.

How did you compare it?

I think that the right way is to give the same positions from your games of
Fritz6a that you guess that Fritz6a is weaker in tactics to Fritz5.32 and see if
Fritz5.32 can see tactics faster.

Impression based only on watching games can be wrong because it is possible that
Fritz6a was unlucky to get positions that Fritz did not like in your games.

I know that Enrique claims that Fritz6a is the best in his secret tactical test
suite.

If you have positions from your games when Fritz6a is weaker in tactics then
please post them.

Uri





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.