Author: blass uri
Date: 13:51:56 03/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 04, 2000 at 16:21:56, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On March 04, 2000 at 12:03:33, blass uri wrote: >>The question is what is the definition of being better in tactics. > >easy, for me better in tactics means: it does not make mistakes that >cause losing pieces or lose whole game in a chess-game. If Fritz5.32 is better than Fritz6a in tactics by your definition then it is possible to demonstrate that Fritz5.32 is better than Fritz6a by posting the positions when Fritz6a did losing material mistakes in your games and Fritz5.32 needs less time to avoid the losing material mistakes. I understand that you play games so you cannot post the relevant positions now Uri
This page took 0.21 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.