Author: Roy Brunjes
Date: 13:32:32 03/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 05, 2000 at 15:07:29, Len Eisner wrote: >On March 05, 2000 at 14:05:13, Roy Brunjes wrote: > >>After the results that Enrique posted for his Cadaques tournament (great effort >>there Enrique -- thanks!), I decided to run a match of my own to see how a >>greater number of games may affect outcome of a match between these two. >> >>Time Control: 40 moves in 40 mins, 40 moves in 40 mins, 40 mins/rest of game >>Computer Used : Pentium II 400 MHz >>Hash Tables: Each program used 48 MB RAM for hash tables >>Tablebases: Default TBs from Fritz 6 CD used (i.e. No Endgame Turbo CD's) >> >>Number of games: 100 -- this took _several_ weeks to complete >> >>Opening Books: Junior 6a used jbook, Fritz 6a used its default (general). >> >>Result: Junior won by 51-49 ... VERY close. >> >>Most people seem to believe that Fritz 6a is the best (or one of the very top) >>programs at Blitz, and that Junior 6a is stronger at slower time controls. This >>match, IMHO, shows that Fritz 6a is also very strong at longer time controls (at >>least up to 40 moves in 40 mins). Junior is reputed to have better positional >>understanding (and I have seen several examples of this posted here and >>elsewhere on the Internet), but Fritz 6a has shown that it's overall abilities >>are pretty much equal. >> >>I can post the games here if there is interest. I don't want to clog CCC with >>the game scores if there is no interest. >> >>Roy > >Did you play the match on a single PC or did you use two machines? > >Len I was forced to use the same machine (running NT) with perm brain switched off. I couldn't tie up two machines that way and I do not have the RS-232 software. Roy
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.