Author: blass uri
Date: 22:18:05 03/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 05, 2000 at 18:09:29, Jorge Pichard wrote: >Most Programs perform excellent whenever there is a tactical position, but some >programs perform better tactically than strategically. A good comparison is >between Rebel 10 or Tiger Rebel, which are very good programs strategically >compare to Deep Junior or Junior 6.0.which is very good tactically. But when you >match them Deep Junior 6.0 is a little bit better than either of the previous >mentioned programs. Why do you think that Junior6 is better in tactical positions relative to TigerRebel? Junior6 searches more nodes per second but you cannot learn from it that it is better in tactics. I know that Rebeltiger did better results in enrique's test suite relative to Junior6. I know that most of the improvement from Junior5 to Junior6 was about the evaluation function. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.