Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Position For Analysis

Author: Mogens Larsen

Date: 13:52:31 03/06/00

Go up one level in this thread


On March 06, 2000 at 16:28:03, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote:

>Hello Dann,
>
>That does surprise me. I don't know if you saw my original post stating that
>Fritz 5.32, Hiarcs 7.32, and CSTal 2.03 all liked Bh2+. CM7000 and Rebel 10
>liked Bxb2+. Rebel-Tiger likes Bf4+. Personally, I see the danger of the rook at
>g1 to be more important than Bxb2+ and going after the rook at a1. What is very
>interesting is Rebel-Tiger's choice of Bf4+ with the intention of taking White's
>Bishop at h6. This is a very interesting choice which still leaves the rook I
>was concerned about at g1 active. However, Tiger seems to be able to hold the
>line. I also wonder if Tiger is the only program to actually play Bf4+?
>
>Mel

I'm by no means a chess wizard, but Bf4+ looks fine to me. Later on the knight
will be well placed a f4 controlling e2 and the rook on g1 won't be able to
prevent blacks pieces in crowding the king. The choice of Bxb2+ is strictly
material I think. Bh2+ is winning, but Bf4+ might turn out to be a more pleasing
choice.

Best wishes...
Mogens



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.