Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 15:42:23 03/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 2000 at 18:14:01, Chessfun wrote: >On March 06, 2000 at 18:04:59, Chessfun wrote: >>On March 06, 2000 at 14:55:02, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>>[D]rnbr2k1/ppq1b1pp/8/3n3Q/8/P7/BP1B1PPP/R3R1K1 b - - acd 13; acn 213354020; acs >>>801; ce 121; pv Kh8 Bxd5 Qd6 Be4 g6 Bc3+ Kg8 Bxg6 Qxg6 Qxg6+ hxg6 Rxe7 Kf8 Rae1 >>>Nc6 Bg7+ Kg8 Rc7; >> >>Analysis by Little Goliath 2000 v2.5: >> >>1...Qd7 2.Re5 Kh8 3.Rxd5 Qc7 4.Rxd8+ Qxd8 5.Bc3 >> -+ (-1.53) Depth: 8 00:00:06 4085kN >>1...Kh8 >> -+ (-1.64) Depth: 8 00:00:12 7840kN >>1...Kh8 2.Bxd5 Qc5 3.Rac1 Qxd5 4.Qxd5 Rxd5 5.Rxc8+ >> -+ (-1.63) Depth: 8 00:00:14 8801kN >>1...Kh8 2.Bxd5 Qc5 3.Rac1 Qxd5 4.Qxd5 Rxd5 5.Rxc8+ >> -+ (-1.63) Depth: 9 00:00:16 10112kN >>1...Kh8 2.Bxd5 Qc5 3.Rac1 Qxd5 4.Qxd5 Rxd5 5.Rxc8+ Rd8 6.Rxd8+ Bxd8 >> -+ (-1.55) Depth: 9 00:00:18 11323kN >>1...Qd7 >> -+ (-1.66) Depth: 9 00:00:23 15619kN >>1...Qd7 2.Re5 Kh8 3.Rxd5 Qc7 4.Rxd8+ Qxd8 5.Bd5 Nc6 6.Rc1 >> -+ (-1.65) Depth: 9 00:00:26 17090kN >>1...Qd7 2.Re5 Kh8 3.Rxd5 Qc7 4.Rxd8+ Qxd8 5.Bd5 Nc6 6.Rc1 >> -+ (-1.65) Depth: 10 00:00:36 23240kN >>1...Qd7 2.Re5 Kh8 3.Rxd5 Qc7 4.Rxd8+ Qxd8 5.Bd5 Nc6 6.Rc1 >> -+ (-1.57) Depth: 11 00:01:37 65644kN >>1...Qd7 2.Re5 Kh8 3.Rxd5 Qe8 4.Rxd8 Qxd8 5.Bb1 Qg8 6.Bxh7 Bg4 7.Bxg8+ Bxh5 8.Re1 >> = (-0.24) Depth: 11 00:02:38 106418kN >>1...Bf8 >> ³ (-0.35) Depth: 11 00:10:42 468057kN >> >>(Bird, Scarb 06.03.2000) >> >>Had it dropped it. > > >I am not so certain the line you posted is the correct one >for both sides. Where does this line come from? That data was created by Crafty 17.09 running on a 500 MHz PIII at 800 seconds evaluation time. Analysis is to ply 13, and centipawn evaluation is +1.2 pawns. 213 million nodes were examinied. A full second of Deep Blue to get the same node count. ;-) If you look at the other evaluation, you will see that the CE is not good.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.