Author: blass uri
Date: 22:37:02 03/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 2000 at 20:56:45, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On March 06, 2000 at 13:50:49, blass uri wrote: > >>On March 06, 2000 at 12:24:55, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On March 06, 2000 at 01:18:05, blass uri wrote: >>> >>>>On March 05, 2000 at 18:09:29, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>>Most Programs perform excellent whenever there is a tactical position, but some >>>>>programs perform better tactically than strategically. A good comparison is >>>>>between Rebel 10 or Tiger Rebel, which are very good programs strategically >>>>>compare to Deep Junior or Junior 6.0.which is very good tactically. But when you >>>>>match them Deep Junior 6.0 is a little bit better than either of the previous >>>>>mentioned programs. >>>> >>>>Why do you think that Junior6 is better in tactical positions relative to >>>>TigerRebel? >>>> >>>>Junior6 searches more nodes per second but you cannot learn from it that it is >>>>better in tactics. >>>> >>>>I know that Rebeltiger did better results in enrique's test suite relative to >>>>Junior6. >>>>I know that most of the improvement from Junior5 to Junior6 was about the >>>>evaluation function. >>>> >>>>Uri >>>I am basing my oppinion on a small test between Junior 6.0 Vs Rebel Tiger 12e of >>>50 games in 60 minutes per side, using two identical AMD 800 Mhz and Junior 6.0 >>>won 28 games; probably the time control and speed of the computers used has a >>>lot to do with the result. It could be that Junior 6.0 calculate deeper than >>>Rebel Tiger 12e, providing faster processor and allowing a time control greater >>>than 60 minutes per side per game. >>> >>>Pichard >> >>It is also possible that Junior6 had a better evaluation. >>You cannot learn from the fact that Junior6 won that it calculated deeper. >> >>Uri >My friend who owned Rebel Tiger 12e knew before the mini match how to set his >program to play with the strongest setting I remember him setting his program to >this setting: > >Rebel Tiger 12e >Permanent Rrain ON >Analysis Brain OFF > >He bought his AMD Athlon 1 week before I did and since my old AMD computer was >too slow a K6 300 Mhz , he recommemded me to buy an AMD ATHLON 800 Mhz similar >to his; I was undicided wether to buy an Intel Pentium III 800 Mhz but just >because of the price and Performance difference and also due to the fact that he >decided to Bet a small fortune of $ 250.00 I agreed to buy it since we are both >programmers interested in the progress of chess softwares. We are facinated >to see how much progress chess softwares have accomplished lately. We would like >sometime to dedicate time to make our own chess Program, but our dedication to >Microsoft has enable us to program our own chess program, we understand that >chess programs have advance so much, that there is little that could be improve >nowaday except the capability of using Multiprosessors which Deep Junior 6.0 is >capable of using. I do not believe that there is a little that could be improved. I believe that if people develop the right program then even a program on 386 can beat kasparov Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.