Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 11:52:16 03/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 08, 2000 at 14:23:30, pete wrote:
>[Event "75/10"]
>[Site "unbekannt"]
>[Date "2000.03.08"]
>[Round "1"]
>[White "Rebel Tiger 12.0en ( with often discussed best settings on PII300) "]
>[Black "Der Bringer ( PIII500) "]
>[Result "Weiß gewinnt"]
>
>1. e4 c5 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } 2. Nf3 e6 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } 3. d4
>cxd4 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } 4. Nxd4 a6 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } 5. Nc3
>Qc7 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } 6. Bd3 Nc6 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } 7. Be3
>Nf6 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } 8. O-O Bd6 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } 9. f4
>Bc5 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } 10. Nf5 Bxe3+ { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } 11. Nxe3
>d6 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } 12. Kh1 O-O { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } 13. g4
>Nd7 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } 14. g5 b5 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } 15. Qh5
>Bb7 { 0.00 0:00:00.0 } 16. Rf3 Rfc8 { 0.18/10 0:03:14.5 } 17. Rd1
>Nd4 { 0.37/9 0:01:37.4 } 18. Rh3 Nf8 { 0.36/11 0:02:15.0 (PB: 0:00:04.3 ) }
>19. Nb1 b4 { 0.34/10 0:02:58.4 (PB: 0:00:05.5 ) } 20. c3 bxc3 { 0.33/9
>0:01:52.2 (PB: 0:01:52.0 ) }
>21. Nxc3 Rab8 { 0.33/10 0:03:36.0 (PB: 0:03:35.8 ) } 22. Kg1
>Qc5 { 0.44/9 0:02:48.1 } 23. Na4 Qa7 { 0.43/10 0:01:24.8 }
>24. Nc3 a5 { 0.43/9 0:02:44.3 } 25. f5 Rc5 { 0.56/9 0:02:26.1 (PB: 0:00:04.0
>) }
>26. Kf1 Ba6 { 0.82/9 0:01:19.0 } 27. f6 Nc2 {-0.40/9 0:07:22.6 }
>28. Ng4 Bxd3+ {-1.35/7 0:02:43.2 } 29. Rdxd3 Rxc3 {-2.52/9 0:02:56.1 }
>30. Rxc3 Qd4 {-2.99/9 0:02:08.9 } 31. fxg7 Qd1+ {-3.93/8 0:01:49.0 (PB:
>0:01:48.8 ) }
>32. Kg2 Qe2+ {-3.99/8 0:01:59.0 (PB: 0:01:58.8 ) } 33. Nf2
>Qxh5 {-4.73/10 0:01:17.9 (PB: 0:01:17.7 ) } 34. gxf8=R+ Kxf8 {-5.94/14
>0:01:45.7 }
>35. Rxh5 Nd4 {-6.03/12 0:01:19.8 } 36. Rxh7 Kg8 {-10.88/11 0:08:18.5 (PB:
>0:00:06.1 ) }
>37. g6 f5 {-8.49/11 0:02:49.7 } 38. exf5 exf5 {-8.45/11 0:01:34.4 }
>
>Weiß gewinnt
>
>At first sight this game ( commented by Bringer ) might not seem that
>interesting : "Ok , another amateur prog gets spanked " one may think ...
>
>But watching it was very thrilling and also raised some interesting questions .
>So a more subjective view :
>
>The opening was Paulsen , one of Bringer's pet lines IMO and both progs agreed
>that after move 26 black was much better ( which seems to be a major
>misevalution ); also the human spectator mistakenly evaluated the same way .
>Now the key moves following :
>
>27. f6 ! ( found by Tiger in the last moment , suddenly failing high ; very good
>move ! )
[d]1r3nk1/q4ppp/b2pp3/p1r2PPQ/3nP3/2NBN2R/PP5P/3R1K2 w - - bm f6;
>27. ... Nc2 ! ( great counter ; after failing low on everything else at last
>suddenly a very promising way to fight back ! )
[d]1r3nk1/q4ppp/b2ppP2/p1r3PQ/3nP3/2NBN2R/PP5P/3R1K2 b - - bm Nc2;
>28. Ng4 !! ( again found very late , and the dashing key move to win the game
>where Nxc2 is not very convincing . )
[d]1r3nk1/q4ppp/b2ppP2/p1r3PQ/4P3/2NBN2R/PPn4P/3R1K2 w - - bm Ng4;
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.