Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Repetition/draw test

Author: John Stanback

Date: 12:00:36 03/08/00

Go up one level in this thread


On March 08, 2000 at 05:11:11, Howard Exner wrote:

>Test your chess engine if it handles this repition theme correctly. To do this
>set up the position below and play the white side yourself. Do not enter the
>winning move Kh5 but instead play the blunder Kg5. Now let your program play the
>black side at say game/15. It will of course play Kd5+ which forces perpetual
>check. After it does that try to trick the program and reply Kg4.
>Now the test - does your program play the correct Qd1+ or does it blunder and
>mistakenly repeat the position with Qe4+, assuming that the opponent will
>blunder again with Kg5? Rebel Century failed this test and assumed white would
>play again the poor move Kg5.
>Why would a program do this? Do other programs fall into this trap of assuming
>a repetition of moves even when not forced?
>
>[D]8/4k3/7Q/8/4q1KP/6P1/8/8 w - -

Zarkov does not have a problem with this test since I do not
count the 2nd repetition of a position as a draw in the first
2 plies of the search.

John



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.