Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 00:07:13 03/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 09, 2000 at 02:53:17, Chessfun wrote: >You yourself had quoted good results of Didzis....these good results >were at game 60 ponder off on one 200 mmx computer. You cannot have >it both ways.....claim they are good when it serves your purpose >then critique the time when it does not so good. > >This is also ponder on on a Cel 433 at those same time controls so it >should act better than at Didzis. if you have a k6-3/450 test how many nps cstal does on it in relation to celeron433. i do not complain. i just want to explain your results. there is always a reason, a sense. nothing happens without sense. >Didzis played two tourneys at 1 hour both are listed on his website. >From what I saw in those two games I have played thus far it is hard >to understand how or why this wasn't already known. And if it was as >you stated.......why wasn't it fixed. > >It's a shame the first game was a very nice game. the bug is not fixed. chris is not interested in fixing it. he is even not ionteresting in programming chess again. he retired because he felt that whole scene of computerchess and it's people boring like hell. there will be no cstal3 or any bugfix anymore. chris has given up computerchess. >Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.