Author: Steve
Date: 03:00:07 03/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 10, 2000 at 23:09:04, James Robertson wrote: >On March 10, 2000 at 21:57:05, Steve wrote: > [snip] >>So those of us who don't write finger notes and who play with increments >>(because otherwise the game degenerates into a silly time-scramble)are all >>presumptive "cheats"? You have got to be kidding! > >That's not what he said. He said high rated guys who play only with increment >__may__ be cheats, not that they should *all* be under suspicion. > >Anybody playing may be a cheat. But if you fit into the above category, the >probably that you are a cheat increases. > >James And what exactly is the difference between saying that players fitting a certain profile are more likely to be cheats and saying that players fitting that profile are all under suspicion? None that I can see.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.