Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chess Tiger on ICS

Author: James T. Walker

Date: 07:26:14 03/11/00

Go up one level in this thread


On March 11, 2000 at 05:14:30, Jeremiah Penery wrote:

>On March 10, 2000 at 20:49:05, Djordje Vidanovic wrote:
>
>>A couple of days ago I started running Chess Tiger 12.0e on FICS and ICC
>>(Lambkin / MagusX).  I played more games on FICS and managed very easily to have
>>Tiger share spot #2 in blitz.  Of course, it will be almost impossible to place
>>that high on ICC as the HW used on ICC is really very impressive and I am using
>>a mere PII-400. I've been impressed by the quality of Tiger's play to that
>>extent that I feel the need to say this out loud. Tiger is absolutely the best
>>program that I have operated on FICS and ICC, and I have tried many of them.  It
>>(he?) has this uncanny positional "feeling" and one may easily be misled into
>>thinking that it is a strong GM playing, not merely a piece of software.  Even
>>though it (he?) was not intended to be a top blitzer it is very, very strong at
>>blitz too.
>>
>>To show you what I meant by "positional feeling", please go through this game in
>>which Tiger faced a very strong Crafty on a fast PIII computer. Tiger played for
>>the weak white squares just as it should be played in the Marshall, and I loved
>>watching it goad Crafty into a tactical disaster:
>
>I'm not sure this is what happened.  Tiger was losing until move 40, when Crafty
>played Kh2, which I think is the losing move.  My modified Crafty immediately
>shows a score of 0.00 when searching this move.  I believe 40. g4 can save the
>win for Crafty.
>
>>[Event "ICC 3 0"]
>>[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
>>[Date "2000.03.10"]
>>[Round "-"]
>>[White "KillerGrob"]
>>[Black "MagusX"]
>>[Result "0-1"]
>>[ICCResult "White checkmated"]
>>[WhiteElo "2744"]
>>[BlackElo "2724"]
>>[Opening "Ruy Lopez: Marshall, main line, 14...Qh3"]
>>[ECO "C89"]
>>[NIC "RL.17"]
>>[Time "19:22:10"]
>>[TimeControl "180+0"]
>>
>>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 O-O 8.
>>c3 d5 9. exd5 Nxd5 10. Nxe5 Nxe5 11. Rxe5 c6 12. d4 Bd6 13. Re1 Qh4 14. g3
>>Qh3 15. Be3 Bg4 16. Qd3 Rae8 17. Nd2 Re6 18. a4 bxa4 19. Rxa4 f5 20. Qf1 Qh5
>>21. f4 Kh8 22. Bxd5 cxd5 23. Rxa6 Qe8 24. Bf2 Rff6 25. Ra5 Be2 26. Qh3 Bg4
>>27. Rxe6 Rxe6 28. Qg2 Re2 29. Nf1 Bc7 30. Rc5 Rxb2 31. Rxc7 Rb1 32. h3 Be2
>>33. Qxd5 Bxf1 34. Kh2 Rb2 35. Qe5 Qg8 36. Qe1 Bd3 37. Qe3 Be4 38. Kg1 Qd8
>>39. Rc5 Kg8 40. Kh2
>
>As I said above, I think this was a total blunder.  On a fast machine, I think
>Crafty should find that this is a draw quite quickly - as it does on my
>relatively slow machine (PII-300).
>
>12->   2:55   2.42   40. g4 Rb1+ 41. Kh2 Rh1+ 42. Kg3 Rd1
>                     43. Qe2 Rd3+ 44. Kh2 Qb8 45. Bg3 Qb1
>                     46. Be1 Qb8 47. Re5 Qf8 48. gxf5 Bxf5

**************
Why are you trying to compare a 3 minute search to a Game/3min situation??
***************

>
>> Qa8 41. g4 Qa2 42. Rc8+ Kf7 43. Kg3 Re2 44. Rc7+ Ke8 45.
>>Qc1 Rxf2 46. Qe3 Re2 47. Qxe2 Qxe2 48. Kh4 fxg4 49. Rxg7 gxh3 50. Kxh3 Qf3+
>>51. Kh4 Qf2+ 52. Kh5 Qh2+ 53. Kg4 Qg2+ 54. Kh4 Qxg7 55. f5 Bf3 56. Kh3 Qg2+
>>57. Kh4 Qg4# {White checkmated} 0-1
>>
>>
>>***  Djordje



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.