Author: blass uri
Date: 16:17:08 03/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 11, 2000 at 18:02:51, Andreas Schwartmann wrote: >On March 11, 2000 at 13:48:58, blass uri wrote: > >>I think that the sponsors should pay her only for winning or drawing in games >>and not for playing(x$ for every win and 0.5x$ for every draw when x is big >>enough to convince xie to play). >> >>It seems that this is the only way to convince humans to play seriously against >>the computers and not to play in another tournament at the same time. >> >>I think that xie has better chances if the sponsors use this idea. >> >>One sponsor use this idea with x=500 but x=500 is probably not big enough to >>convince xie to play. >> >>Uri > > >Well ... I did not actually know that she is playing another tourney >simultaniously. But since she is not even the women's #1 but only FIDE champion, >for whatever THAT is worth ... and since the best woman player Judit Polgar has >suffered serious defeats against Junior last year ... and since Deep Junior >performed so good vs. Michael Adams in KasparovChess's last try ... my opinion >is that Mrs. Xie will not stand a chance against Amir's baby. > >Simple as that, >Andreas Some facts: 1)Judit polgar lost against Fritz and not against Junior and it was not tournament time control but game/30. 2)Judit polgar was not prepared against Fritz. 3)Adams was not prepared against Junior because he also played in more than one tournament in the same time. 4)You can get some data about computers ability from the Israeli league. One master drew against Fritz and shredder so you can learn that masters if they are prepared have good chances to draw against computers. Deep Junior is slightly better than Fritz and shredder but the difference between Xie and a master is bigger.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.