Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 18:02:19 03/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 11, 2000 at 18:02:51, Andreas Schwartmann wrote: >On March 11, 2000 at 13:48:58, blass uri wrote: > >>I think that the sponsors should pay her only for winning or drawing in games >>and not for playing(x$ for every win and 0.5x$ for every draw when x is big >>enough to convince xie to play). >> >>It seems that this is the only way to convince humans to play seriously against >>the computers and not to play in another tournament at the same time. >> >>I think that xie has better chances if the sponsors use this idea. >> >>One sponsor use this idea with x=500 but x=500 is probably not big enough to >>convince xie to play. >> >>Uri > > >Well ... I did not actually know that she is playing another tourney >simultaniously. But since she is not even the women's #1 but only FIDE champion, >for whatever THAT is worth ... and since the best woman player Judit Polgar has >suffered serious defeats against Junior last year ... and since Deep Junior >performed so good vs. Michael Adams in KasparovChess's last try ... my opinion >is that Mrs. Xie will not stand a chance against Amir's baby. > >Simple as that, >Andreas I have to agreed with you that Deep Junior 6.0 had already faced tougher competition and if the world have to see Deep Junior 6.0 face a champion why not pit DP Vs FIDE world champion Khalifman, since he is not usually book to play in many tournaments and he is much more closer to DJ assume rating; therefore, after he get defeated as well, then the only choice left for DJ will be to match Kasparov. But of course, this would not be possible until Amir manage to place DJ on a quad 1000 Mhz system, in order to defeat Kasparov.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.