Author: Mark Schreiber
Date: 06:56:30 03/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
I think Deep Junior would do better that 1:5. I also agree computers should play in human tournaments. But unfortunately we are in the minority, even in this forum. I asked this question in the opinion poll; if computers should be allowed to play in the qualifying matches for the world championship? 272 out of 424 said no. This I don’t understand. On March 12, 2000 at 07:47:50, Alessandro Morales wrote: >>I am not sure if losing 5:1 or 6:0 against kasparov is going to increase >>Junior's sales. >>I expect kasparov to win at least 5:1 every commercial program. > >I think that Deep Junior 6 (on a Quad 500+ Pentium III) is not much weaker than >Deeper Blue, also if it runs on an hardware 250 times slower.. >The difference is that Kasparov could buy Deep Junior 6 and then >find how to beat it...before the true match starts. > >>No human could be the world champion without beating weaker players than >>kasparov and I do not think that machines should have more rights. >> >>I think also that computers should play against humans in tournaments and that >>the decision not to let computers to play in most tournament is wrong. >> > >Here I agree . National and International federations should let >programs to participate to the tournaments exactly like an human player, >starting from 1400 elo up to 2800+ .. They could also use the learning function >if this file , the latest engine and opening library could be downloaded and >updated before every match (using always the best hardware available..) >So programs could be entities like real players... > >Alessandro Morales > >>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.