Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: K and Q vs. K

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 19:36:23 03/12/00

Go up one level in this thread


On March 12, 2000 at 20:36:24, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>On March 12, 2000 at 16:54:59, Richard A. Fowell (fowell@netcom.com) wrote:
>
>> Forced moves could be annotated as : (duh!)
>>     but that's both lengthy and a bit insulting.
>> You can send email to Steve Edwards suggesting a new NAG for the next
>>     version of PGN.
>> As far as a symbol goes, I don't know Perhaps a lowercase greek phi,
>>     which is often used to represent the null set, which is the set
>>     of alternatives, here.
>
>It is pointless to make a symbol for an "only legal move" situation.
>
>Also, Bob could consider fixing his Crafty TB output thing so that it doesn't
>emit "!" if there is only one legal move, it would be a simple change.
>
>bruce


Alread done. :)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.