Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 19:18:35 03/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 13, 2000 at 21:48:32, Derrick Williams wrote: [snip] > I meant quad xeon 400 thinking of the machine Crafty runs on at Icc. I was not >attempting to be scientific or mathematical, I was only interested in expressing >a guess based on intuition and expierence playing the machines. It may be >meaningless to guess, but it is extremely interesting. Regardless of whatever or >not there is enough hard evidence to base an opinion, people like myself want to >get some kind of ideal (even if that Ideal is vague), of what the playing >strength of their silicon opponents are. In many circumstances Theory must >always come before fact, my theory is computers are GM's, based on intuition and >a Good amount of 40/2 games. You make a good point: Theory should be based on observations or well defined principles. However, I think the observations that we have are often not well defined. At any rate, time will tell.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.