Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Some positions from last week analyzed at very long time control

Author: Bernhard Bauer

Date: 00:49:27 03/14/00

Go up one level in this thread


On March 14, 2000 at 03:40:32, Harald Faber wrote:

>On March 13, 2000 at 20:17:45, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>[d]1r3rk1/2qnppb1/b2p2pp/p1pP4/P1P5/3B1NP1/2QBPP1P/1R3RK1 w - - acd 19; acn
>>-1204606852; acs 50001; bm Rb4; ce 14; pv Rxb8 Rxb8 Rb1 Rxb1+ Qxb1 Qb6 Qc2 Nf6
>>Kg2 Ne8 Qc1 Kh7 Qd1 Nf6 h3 Kh8 Qc1 Ng8 Bc3 Qb3 Bxa5 Qxa4;
>
>
>IIRC it must be black to move, otherwise it would not make any sense if the bm
>should be Rb4, black can easily capture the rook with a pawn. :-)))
>
>
>>[d]3rq1k1/4rppp/2n3b1/pp2P3/2pP1QB1/P1P1R3/1B4PP/4R1K1 w - - acd 17; acn
>>-1281918808; acs 50001; bm Re6; ce 168; pv Bf3 Qd7 d5 Nb8 a4 Ree8 e6 fxe6 dxe6
>>Qa7 axb5 Rxe6 Qxc4 Bf7 Qe2 Qb6 Bc1 a4;
>
>
>The same here, bm Re6 can only be a black move, Re6 played by white is a tale
>move. :-)))
>
>
>>[d]2q2rk1/p1rn1ppp/1p2pn2/8/Q2P4/2P2N2/P2B1PPP/2RR2K1 w - - acd 18; acn
>>-1139116560; acs 50000; bm Rc4; ce 13; pv c4 Rd8 Bf4 Rc6 Ne5 Nxe5 dxe5 Nd7 Rd4
>>Rc7 Rcd1 h6 h3 a5 a3 g5 Be3 Rc6;
>
>
>Hmm, in edit mode, without the position in view, is this one correct?

No this position is not correct, neither the others.
Why not double check? -:)))

[d]corbits1/epd5/should2/be6/double2/checked1/8/ w - - acd 64; acn -999999999;
acs 500000; bm double_check; ce d o u b l e c h e c k
k i n d r e g a r d s  B e r n h a r d;



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.