Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 10:56:49 03/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 14, 2000 at 03:49:27, Bernhard Bauer wrote: [snip] >No this position is not correct, neither the others. >Why not double check? -:))) > >[d]corbits1/epd5/should2/be6/double2/checked1/8/ w - - acd 64; acn -999999999; >acs 500000; bm double_check; ce d o u b l e c h e c k >k i n d r e g a r d s B e r n h a r d; None of these are my positions. They were all posed by someone else. Actually, I am getting pretty annoyed at bogus EPD positions. I think, from now on, I will only analyze those posted by persons I know are capable of producing a correct one. I have spent several machine-days of wasted time on this crap when those same machines could have been analyzing CAP data. I'm rather disgusted.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.