Author: blass uri
Date: 10:06:42 03/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 16, 2000 at 12:44:44, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: >Mr. Godat, > >That was not my choice but rather Junior 6a's choice. I thought that the whole >game was strange until I read that it was an operator error that caused the >whole thing in the first place. > >As far as I am concerned, Xie Jun would have had a score of 2 wins and 3 losses >and 2 draws against Deep Junior 6.x if the match were played in Israel and not >over the lousy phone lines in China (they will get better). The final score, >not counting the first game, was 1.5 to 1.5, with two games that I think the >Junior team were cheated on ie no opening book and operator error. The first >game was thrown out at the request of Xie Jun and was a win for Deep Junior 6. I disagree This game was not played and we cannot know what was the result if there was no connection problem. The only reason to call this game a win for Deep Junior is if Deep Junior had a clear advantage(I do not have the game so I do not know) but I read that the game was stopped after 10 moves and I do not believe that Deep Junior could get a clear advantage after 10 moves. Xie was also cheated in the game she lost because she played it at 60/40 and not at 120/40 and we have no idea what could be in a fair match. There was no one fair game in the match. > >Ms. Polgar lost to Junior 5 and Deep Junior is one hell of a lot stronger than >Junior 5 by at least 150 elo points. Ms. polgar lost against Fritz and not against Junior5. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.