Author: Mark Ryan
Date: 20:30:27 03/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 16, 2000 at 13:41:18, Andreas Stabel wrote: >Since all GM games usually goes into the game bases used for creating opening >libraries, it is evident that we now have gotten the new opening theory >1. e4 e5 2. Qh5 Nc6 3. Qf3 >as part of our common opening theory (From the Becker - Kasparov game :) ) > >But as a patzer of 1300-1400 on FICS I would say that Becker played well. >After analyzing with crafty my impression is that he had an almost equal >position after move 10 Hi, Andreas: after one full minute of analysis of the position after move 10, my Fritz 5.32 gives Boris a SLIGHT ADVANTAGE. We might be on to something here! and that even after the blunder 11. Be2 he played >sensible moves. To anticipate the next blunder 13. Bxe4 you have to see >three moves ahead, which at least from my view takes a good chess player Andreas, in my case it takes a miracle. Mark :) >to do. I would say the same about 15. Kd1 which on first glance seem to >hide the king better than 15. Kf1. Of course 16. Re1 was a disaster, but >at my level at least, missing a check and the consequences are not unusual. >And here too one has to see three moves to discover the mate. > >All in all, I would say that Becker played well for an amateur, and that I >for one would not claim that I would have lasted longer against Kasparov. > >Of course I'm looking forward to the opportunity to try, so if anybody has >a direct line to Garry - I'M READY !!!!!! > >Best regards >Andreas Stabel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.