Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 18:31:38 03/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 17, 2000 at 21:03:40, Ernst A. Heinz wrote: >Hi Dann, > >>In order to create an accurate tactical suite, I would like to have these rows >>crunched by alternative software tools. The current analysis does not get "the >>right answer" so the question is, will other programs see it? > >Most of the positions you posted do *not* seem to be tactical but >rather positional in nature (e.g. "Soszynski 80 #13" is actually >from the positional subset of LCT-II). > >>[D]r1r3k1/5p2/p3p1p1/b6p/Pp2N3/1P2P3/5PPP/2R1K2R w K - acd 18; acn 1259897193; >>ce -32; pv O-O Bd8 Rfd1 Be7 Kf1 Kf8 Ke1 f5 Ng3 Rc3 Rb1 Kf7 Ne2 Rc5 Rbc1 Rac8 >>Rxc5 Bxc5 Nd4; pm O-O; bm Ke2; id "Soszynski 80 #8"; > >Positional -- "DarkThought WCCC'99" never chooses 0-0 as best. It likes >Ke2 from the beginning and even switches to Kd2 in iteration #15. Which brings the question to mind: why would anyone want their king on g1 instead of d2 or e2 here? Playing O-O looks like a serious mistake to me. Dave
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.