Author: Chris Whittington
Date: 14:16:38 09/27/97
Go up one level in this thread
On September 27, 1997 at 17:08:19, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On September 27, 1997 at 13:35:06, Chris Whittington wrote: > >>I guess Thorsten was using Mchess as an illustration, because he >>believes icca is for itself. He believes this, I guess, out of personal >>experience. For example, it seems that Thorsten is in effect banned >>right now. Thorsten can tell us about this if he wants. > >We can fight about the ICCA all you guys want, I'm not very interested in fighting over the icca - my views are known, they haven't changed. > but primarily I want to >find out what happened with MChess. True. What do we know ? 1. That Mchess is not playing, is not on any icca list that has been circulated to participants. 2. That's it, that's all we know What do we guess at ? 1. That Mchess applied late ? 2. That there may be a financial problem with finding $1000, re the Stamer business last year ? 3. That maybe Mchess is no 1 on the reserve list ? 4. That maybe Mchess haad been arguing over the $1000 for some time before the deadline ? 5. That the icca have a problem with Peter, re Thorsten's allegations ? 6. Maybe some more speculation ? Much speculation. Maybe none of this, maybe more. If Peter Screiner comes in (see other threads) he can tell us. Chris > >bruce >
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.