Author: blass uri
Date: 09:28:57 03/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 20, 2000 at 03:49:50, Paulo Soares wrote: >On March 20, 2000 at 00:58:48, Côme wrote: > >>On March 19, 2000 at 22:22:34, Paulo Soares wrote: >> >>>On March 19, 2000 at 21:48:30, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote: >>> >>>>...maybe it will be available in the next 2 years. >>>> >>>>A. Ponti >>> >>>Which would be the largest number of pieces to be used in Nalimov >>>Tablebases with 140Mgz? 7, 8, 9? >>> >>>Paulo Soares, from Brazil >> >>Hello, >>IMHO only 6 pieces. >>Best Regards >>Alexandre Côme > >Only 6! How many memory for 7 pieces? >Thanks, >Paulo I think that if you want all of them you need about some hundreds times more memory for adding one piece. The problem is that the number of possibility of 7 pieces is significantly bigger than the number of possibility of 6 pieces and not only the fact that you need about 60 times more memory for one 7 pieces tablebase relative to 6 pieces tablebase. You need some Gbytes for 5 pieces tablebases then you probably need some hundreds of thoushands of Gbytes for all the 7 pieces tablebases You need sometimes hundreds of mbytes for one 5 pieces tablebases so you need something some Gbytes to use one 6 men tablebases and you need something like 100-200 Gbytes to use only one 7 men tablebase. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.